The other songs we transferred into Cubase in 32 bit mode. We tracked several songs on to 2" 16-track tape and completely finished and mixed one song in the analog domain for a Quicksand tribute comp. (The band's singer/songwriter is Shaun Lopez who was a founding member of Far. (Check for more info on UV22 and dithering) So how does it sound? I recently did a project for a band called The Revolution Smile. Previously only found on more high-end and expensive hardware and software, it's cool that Steinberg has included it as a standard option. UV22 applies an advanced dithering algorithm that most mastering engineers claim sounds better than anything else on the market. When you mix a song down from 24 bits to 16, or convert 24 bit files to 16 bit for CD mastering, you are just discarding the extra 8 bits. Lastly, Steinberg has licensed Apogee's UV-22 dithering algorithm and it is included in VST 32. There is a control panel where you can set the amount of "drive" from 1 to 24 dBs of saturation. This algorithm was written to simulate the compression and saturation effects of analog tape. The True-Tape algorithm on the other hand, creates 32 bit files from the get go. The point here is that as the files are manipulated in 32 bit floating point, the files are then kept at the longer word length, rather than being truncated down to 24 bits. Just about every sound card that I've seen only supports 24 bit files, and just about all software supports at least 32 bit floating point calculations. 32 bit sound files allow for much greater dynamic range than 24 bit files. 5 has introduced three new sonic features: 32 bit sound files, True-Tape recording and an implementation of Apogee's UV-22 dithering algorithm. While most new software development seems aimed at new capabilities, VST 32 V. The point is that with version 5 of VST 32, Steinberg has addressed several areas that have a direct sonic impact on the music you record that haven't been widely addressed until now. I haven't used Cubase, or any other software, enough to write an exhaustive review of it, so that's not the point of this short review. I think it comes down to personal preference and learning the details of each package enough to decide which one works best for you. It would be hard to say that one is drastically better, or even different, from another. There are quite a few different recording programs available now, and they're all really pretty amazing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |